当前位置:首页 >> 其它课程 >>

assessment criteria


Details—all essays

Assessment criteria

This section provides an overview of what each criterion assesses in the extended essay. Further advice on interpreting the assess

ment criteria is provided within the guidelines for each subject in the “Details—subject specific” section.

A: research question
(Objectives 1 and 2) This criterion assesses the extent to which the purpose of the essay is specified. In many subjects, the aim of the essay will normally be expressed as a question and, therefore, this criterion is called the “research question”. However, certain disciplines may permit or encourage different ways of formulating the research task.

Achievement level 0

Descriptor The research question is not stated in the introduction or does not lend itself to a systematic investigation in an extended essay in the subject in which it is registered. The research question is stated in the introduction but is not clearly expressed or is too broad in scope to be treated effectively within the word limit. The research question is clearly stated in the introduction and sharply focused, making effective treatment possible within the word limit.

1

2

? International Baccalaureate Organization 2007

25

Assessment criteria

B: introduction
(Objectives 1 and 5) This criterion assesses the extent to which the introduction makes clear how the research question relates to existing knowledge on the topic and explains how the topic chosen is significant and worthy of investigation.

Achievement level 0

Descriptor Little or no attempt is made to set the research question into context. There is little or no attempt to explain the significance of the topic. Some attempt is made to set the research question into context. There is some attempt to explain the significance of the topic and why it is worthy of investigation. The context of the research question is clearly demonstrated. The introduction clearly explains the significance of the topic and why it is worthy of investigation.

1

2

C: investigation
(Objectives 1 and 3) This criterion assesses the extent to which the investigation is planned and an appropriate range of sources has been consulted, or data has been gathered, that is relevant to the research question. Where the research question does not lend itself to a systematic investigation in the subject in which the essay is registered, the maximum level that can be awarded for this criterion is 2.

Achievement level 0

Descriptor There is little or no evidence that sources have been consulted or data gathered, and little or no evidence of planning in the investigation. A range of inappropriate sources has been consulted, or inappropriate data has been gathered, and there is little evidence that the investigation has been planned. A limited range of appropriate sources has been consulted, or data has been gathered, and some relevant material has been selected. There is evidence of some planning in the investigation. A sufficient range of appropriate sources has been consulted, or data has been gathered, and relevant material has been selected. The investigation has been satisfactorily planned. An imaginative range of appropriate sources has been consulted, or data has been gathered, and relevant material has been carefully selected. The investigation has been well planned.

1

2

3

4

26

? International Baccalaureate Organization 2007

Assessment criteria

D: knowledge and understanding of the topic studied
(Objectives 3 and 7) Where the research question does not lend itself to a systematic investigation in the subject in which the essay is registered, the maximum level that can be awarded for this criterion is 2. “Academic context”, as used in this guide, can be defined as the current state of the field of study under investigation. However, this is to be understood in relation to what can reasonably be expected of a pre-university student. For example, to obtain a level 4, it would be sufficient to relate the investigation to the principal lines of inquiry in the relevant field; detailed, comprehensive knowledge is not required.

Achievement level 0

Descriptor The essay demonstrates no real knowledge or understanding of the topic studied. The essay demonstrates some knowledge but little understanding of the topic studied. The essay shows little awareness of an academic context for the investigation. The essay demonstrates an adequate knowledge and some understanding of the topic studied. The essay shows some awareness of an academic context for the investigation. The essay demonstrates a good knowledge and understanding of the topic studied. Where appropriate, the essay successfully outlines an academic context for the investigation. The essay demonstrates a very good knowledge and understanding of the topic studied. Where appropriate, the essay clearly and precisely locates the investigation in an academic context.

1

2

3

4

? International Baccalaureate Organization 2007

27

Assessment criteria

E: reasoned argument
(Objectives 1 and 4) This criterion assesses the extent to which the essay uses the material collected to present ideas in a logical and coherent manner, and develops a reasoned argument in relation to the research question. Where the research question does not lend itself to a systematic investigation in the subject in which the essay is registered, the maximum level that can be awarded for this criterion is 2.

Achievement level 0

Descriptor There is no attempt to develop a reasoned argument in relation to the research question. There is a limited or superficial attempt to present ideas in a logical and coherent manner, and to develop a reasoned argument in relation to the research question. There is some attempt to present ideas in a logical and coherent manner, and to develop a reasoned argument in relation to the research question, but this is only partially successful. Ideas are presented in a logical and coherent manner, and a reasoned argument is developed in relation to the research question, but with some weaknesses. Ideas are presented clearly and in a logical and coherent manner. The essay succeeds in developing a reasoned and convincing argument in relation to the research question.

1

2

3

4

F: application of analytical and evaluative skills appropriate to the subject
(Objective 7) Achievement level 0 1 2 3 4

Descriptor The essay shows no application of appropriate analytical and evaluative skills. The essay shows little application of appropriate analytical and evaluative skills. The essay shows some application of appropriate analytical and evaluative skills, which may be only partially effective. The essay shows sound application of appropriate analytical and evaluative skills. The essay shows effective and sophisticated application of appropriate analytical and evaluative skills.

28

? International Baccalaureate Organization 2007

Assessment criteria

G: use of language appropriate to the subject
(Objective 6) Achievement level 0

Descriptor The language used is inaccurate and unclear. There is no effective use of terminology appropriate to the subject. The language used sometimes communicates clearly but does not do so consistently. The use of terminology appropriate to the subject is only partly accurate. The language used for the most part communicates clearly. The use of terminology appropriate to the subject is usually accurate. The language used communicates clearly. The use of terminology appropriate to the subject is accurate, although there may be occasional lapses. The language used communicates clearly and precisely. Terminology appropriate to the subject is used accurately, with skill and understanding.

1

2

3

4

H: conclusion
(Objectives 1, 4 and 5) This criterion assesses the extent to which the essay incorporates a conclusion that is relevant to the research question and is consistent with the evidence presented in the essay.

Achievement level 0

Descriptor Little or no attempt is made to provide a conclusion that is relevant to the research question. A conclusion is attempted that is relevant to the research question but may not be entirely consistent with the evidence presented in the essay. An effective conclusion is clearly stated; it is relevant to the research question and consistent with the evidence presented in the essay. It should include unresolved questions where appropriate to the subject concerned.

1

2

? International Baccalaureate Organization 2007

29

Assessment criteria

I: formal presentation
(Objective 5) This criterion assesses the extent to which the layout, organization, appearance and formal elements of the essay consistently follow a standard format. The formal elements are: title page, table of contents, page numbers, illustrative material, quotations, documentation (including references, citations and bibliography) and appendices (if used).

Achievement level 0 1 2 3 4

Descriptor The formal presentation is unacceptable, or the essay exceeds 4,000 words. The formal presentation is poor. The formal presentation is satisfactory. The formal presentation is good. The formal presentation is excellent.

J: abstract
(Objective 5) The requirements for the abstract are for it to state clearly the research question that was investigated, how the investigation was undertaken and the conclusion(s) of the essay.

Achievement level 0 1 2

Descriptor The abstract exceeds 300 words or one or more of the required elements of an abstract (listed above) is missing. The abstract contains the elements listed above but they are not all clearly stated. The abstract clearly states all the elements listed above.

30

? International Baccalaureate Organization 2007

Assessment criteria

K: holistic judgment
(Objective 1) The purpose of this criterion is to assess the qualities that distinguish an essay from the average, such as intellectual initiative, depth of understanding and insight. While these qualities will be clearly present in the best work, less successful essays may also show some evidence of them and should be rewarded under this criterion.

Achievement level 0 1 2 3 4

Descriptor The essay shows no evidence of such qualities. The essay shows little evidence of such qualities. The essay shows some evidence of such qualities. The essay shows clear evidence of such qualities. The essay shows considerable evidence of such qualities.

? International Baccalaureate Organization 2007

31


相关文章:
Assessment criteria(how to grade)
Assessment Criteria and ... 暂无评价 67页 免费 assessment criteria 2页 2财富值 assessment criteria 暂无评价 7页 免费 assessment_criteria 暂无评价 6页 1...
Assessment Criteria PG Consec09
Assessment Criteria PG Consec09_法律资料_人文社科_专业资料。Heriot-Watt University School of Management & Languages Department of Languages & Intercultural Stud...
assessment criteria translation practice 2015
assessment criteria translation practice 2015_法律资料_人文社科_专业资料。MSc/Diploma in Interpreting and Translating (including Arabic-English and Chinese-...
Assessment criteria group presentation
Assessment criteria group presentationAssessment criteria group presentation隐藏>> Des 415 Final Assignment: Group Presentation For this assignment you will be ...
assessment criteria
暂无评价 13页 5财富值 Criteria for assessment ... 13页 1财富值如要投诉违规内容,请到百度文库投诉中心;如要提出功能问题或意见建议,请点击此处进行反馈。...
Organizational Assessment Group Paper Criteria
Assessment criteria grou... 2页 1财富值 Mile's Organizational As... 暂无评价 15页 免费 assessment criteria 2页 2财富值 assessment criteria 暂无评价 7...
Assessment criteria, C41LI, dissertation by research
Assessment criteria, C41LI, dissertation by research_临床医学_医药卫生_专业资料。国外dissertation要求 School of Management & Languages Department of Languages &...
宝洁AC网申-assessment
are being invited to move forward to Step 2 of our process – Assessment...criteria requi red for s uccessfully performing the job for which you ...
BMA258 Indvidual Essay Assessment Criteria and Marking Scheme
BMA258 Assessment one Criteria and Marking Scheme Student Name: Comments: Student ID: Mark: /15 Assessor: Criteria HD (High Distinction) 90% – 100%...
Project Risk Assessment (项目风险评估英文版)
and of these 134 were given further attention and qualitatively assessed against the Rio Tinto assessment criteria and Last Reviewed: [10 January 2012] ...
更多相关标签:
criteria | assessment | 高中英语作文题 | self assessment | supplier assessment | self assessment 范文 | risk assessment | self assessment 模板 |