Published on Web 01/19/2007
High-Resolution Structure of a -Peptide Bundle
Douglas S. Daniels,? E. James Petersson,? Jade X. Qiu,? and Alanna Schepartz*,?,?
f Chemistry and Molecular, Cellular, and DeVelopmental Biology, Yale UniVersity, New HaVen, Connecticut 06520-8107
Received December 4, 2006; E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Non-natural polymers have the capacity to recapitulate both the well-folded structures and resultant functionalities of biological polymers. Peptides composed of 3-amino acids, which have one additional backbone methylene unit compared to natural R-amino acids, can adopt stable helices in water1-3 and interact with cellular proteins and membranes.4-8 More sophisticated -peptide functionality, however, must await the incorporation of higher order structure. Previous efforts toward this goal have generated constrained tertiary interactions using disulfide bonds,9 nucleobase pairing,10 or metal chelation.11 Quaternary structures lacking a welldefined stoichiometry have also been reported.12,13 These advances, however, did not provide structures that rival the stable, discrete, and compact assemblies of natural proteins. Here we report a -dodecapeptide (Zwit-1F, Figure 1A) that self-assembles spontaneously in aqueous solution into a highly thermostable -peptide octamer and determine its structure by X-ray crystallography. Peptides composed of 3-amino acids favor a 314 helical secondary structure characterized by a 14-membered hydrogen-bond ring between the amide at position i and the carbonyl of position i + 2, a left-handed helical twist, and three distinct faces.14,15 We recently reported a -peptide pair (Acid-1F, Base-1F) that assembles in an equimolar ratio into a -peptide quaternary structure, a cooperatively folded assembly of -peptide subunits.16 Like Acid-1F and Base-1F, the design of Zwit-1F uses residues on each of the three 314-helical faces to control higher order structure. Residues along one helical face promote 314 helicity through salt-bridge formation, while those on a second use 3-homoleucines to drive oligomerization, akin to leucine zipper proteins (Figure 1A). While Acid-1F and Base-1F bear crosscomplementary charges at positions 1 and 10 on the third face to drive hetero-oligomerization, Zwit1-F employs self-complementary charges to favor homo-oligomerization. Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy indicates that Zwit-1F is minimally structured in buffered aqueous solution at low ?M concentration but undergoes a concentration-dependent increase in 314-helical structure (Figure 1B), suggesting the formation of a wellstructured oligomer. The thermally induced change in the CD spectrum of Zwit-1F is sigmoidal, indicating cooperativity in the unfolding process (Figure 1C). Moreover, the Zwit-1F oligomer is exceptionally stable; even at 100 ?M the TM is 70 °C, definitively within the range observed for well-folded small proteins.17 Data from sedimentation equilibrium experiments are consistent with an oligomer of discrete stoichiometry, fitting well to both hexamer and octamer models.18 To unambiguously define the oligomerization state of Zwit-1F and detail the interactions of its assembly, we determined its structure by X-ray crystallography. To aid phasing, we synthesized an analogue of Zwit-1F bearing 3-4-iodohomophenylalanine at position 4 (Zwit-1F*). Zwit-1F* exhibits concentration-dependent
Figure 1. (A) Helical net cartoon of Zwit-1F with -amino acids represented by single-letter codes. 3O signifies 3-homoornithine. Concentration (B) and temperature (C) dependent CD spectra of Zwit-1F at 25 °C in phosphate buffer (pH 7.1).
Figure 2. (A) Ribbon diagram of the Zwit-1F octamer, with parallel 314 helices in like shades. (B) Space-filling rendering of 3-homoleucine sidechains in green illustrate the well-packed hydrophobic core, while interior (C) and exterior (D) views of each hand detail the hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions of the assembly.
Department of Chemistry. Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology.
secondary structure and sedimentation equilibria comparable to Zwit-1F18 and crystallizes from similar conditions, allowing calculation of initial phases by single-wavelength anomalous scattering. The final model of Zwit-1F thus derived is refined against data to 1.45 ? resolution and contains two pairs of parallel 314 helices per asymmetric unit. Individually, these four crystallographically unique monomers exhibit metrics that deviate only slightly from an ideal 314 helix. The root-mean-square deviation between all monomers is 1.44 ?, and all possible i to i + 2 main-chain hydrogen bonds are observed, with the exception of the N-terminal residue in one monomer. The average backbone dihedral angles ( ) -135.5°, ψ ) -126.4°, ? ) 55.6°) correspond well to those expected for the 314 helix.19 Crystallographic symmetry relates two copies of the asymmetric unit, however, to bury 2421 ?2 of surface area and reveal the octameric structure of Zwit-1F (Figure 2A). The Zwit-1F octamer is best described as a pair of tetrameric “hands”, each composed of four 314 helices cupped at approximately a 90° angle to each other. The two halves of each hand are composed of symmetry-equivalent parallel dimers oriented in an
10.1021/ja068678n CCC: $37.00 ? 2007 American Chemical Society
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2007, 129, 1532-1533
In summary, here we describe the first high-resolution -peptide quaternary structure. Despite significant differences between the secondary structures of discrete 314 helices and R-helices and the interactions between them, the Zwit-1F structure is remarkably protein-like. Composed of a discrete number of helices and possessing a solvent-excluded hydrophobic core, the assembly is driven only by noncovalent inter-residue interactions and is highly thermostable. Structures such as this “ -protein” promise the opportunity for more sophisticated functionality from future -peptides.
Figure 3. Comparison of leucine packing in (A) the leucine zipper GCN420 with the (B) antiparallel and (C) parallel interfaces of Zwit-1F. Helices are represented as solid cylinders, side chains as knobs, and interface leucines colored green.
antiparallel fashion. 3-Homoleucine side chains decorate the interior of each hand. Their sequestration buries a total surface area of 2385 ?2 with less than 10 ?2 of average solvent accessible surface per residue, creating a hydrophobic core highly reminiscent of globular protein structures (Figure 2B). Packing between pairs of helices in each hand involves interactions between residues on two helical faces. Both parallel and antiparallel helical pairs exhibit packing of 3-homoleucine side chains, in accord with our design (Figure 2C). The antiparallel interaction in the center of each hand positions the salt-bridge faces of each helix to make complementary electrostatic interactions across the interface (Figure 2D). Parallel helical pairs associate the aromatic face of an internal helix with the salt-bridge face of a terminal helix, with 3-E1 and 3-O10 forming electrostatic contacts with 3-O3 and 3-D12, respectively. In addition, the 3-F side chains exhibit a degree of hydrophobic packing from the side chain carbon atoms of opposing 3-D6 and 3-O9. Despite the differences in specific interactions, both helical arrangements are tightly packed, with parallel and antiparallel interfaces burying 796 and 784 ?2 of surface area, respectively, approximately 50% of a monomer. This percentage, as well as the mass-adjusted buried surface area (480 ?2/kDa), are nearly identical to those of coiled-coil proteins (450 ?2/kDa, 51.5%).20 Inspiration for the design of a 3-homoleucine face to promote interhelix interaction came from the leucine zipper motif of coiledcoil proteins.20 While the 314-helical interfaces display association of leucine faces, there are significant differences in packing when compared to the knobs-into-holes pattern that allowed Crick to predict the supercoiling of leucine zippers (Figure 3).21 The periodicity of knobs and holes displayed in R-helical turns is a result of a repeat of 3.5-3.6 residues per turn. The nearly integral 3.1 residues/turn of 314 helices does not allow a similar complementary periodicity, however. Zwit-1F helices are instead offset along the helical axis, staggering the display of residues between the interacting faces. This interface allows a closer approach of the helices (?8.5 ? between helical axes) than in coiled-coil proteins (?9.5 ?) and greater main-chain contact, with direct backbone methylene contacts generating 23-33% of dimer interface. We anticipate that the participation of this additional methylene in packing interactions will be a general feature of higher order -peptide structure.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the NIH and the National Foundation for Cancer Research and is based in part upon research conducted at the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source (CHESS), which is supported by the NSF, using the macromolecular diffraction at CHESS (MacCHESS) facility, which is supported by the NIH. This research was also supported by the Yale Center for Structural Biology, whose faculty and staff we gratefully acknowledge for use of their data collection facilities.
Supporting Information Available: Table containing data collection and refinement statistics, experimental details for crystallography, and sedimentation equilibrium. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org. CCDC 633286 contains atomic coordinates and supplementary crystallographic data for Zwit-1F. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif. References
(1) Cheng, R. P.; DeGrado, W. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5162-5163. (2) Arvidsson, P. I.; Rueping, M.; Seebach, D. Chem. Commun. 2001, 649650. (3) Hart, S. A.; Bahadoor, A. B. F.; Matthews, E. E.; Qiu, X. Y. J.; Schepartz, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4022-4023. (4) Kritzer, J. A.; Lear, J. D.; Hodsdon, M. E.; Schepartz, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9468-9469. (5) Karlsson, A. J.; Pomerantz, W. C.; Weisblum, B.; Gellman, S. H.; Palecek, S. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12630-12631. (6) Raguse, T. L.; Porter, E. A.; Weisblum, B.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12774-12785. (7) Stephens, O. M.; Kim, S.; Welch, B. D.; Hodsdon, M. E.; Kay, M. S.; Schepartz, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13126-13127. (8) Werder, M.; Hauser, H.; Abele, S.; Seebach, D. HelV. Chim. Acta 1999, 82, 1774-1783. (9) Cheng, R. P.; DeGrado, W. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1156411565. (10) Bruckner, A. M.; Chakraborty, P.; Gellman, S. H.; Diederichsen, U. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4395-4399. (11) Lelais, G.; Seebach, D.; Jaun, B.; Mathad, R. I.; Flogel, O.; Rossi, F.; Campo, M.; Wortman, A. HelV. Chim. Acta 2006, 89, 361-403. (12) Raguse, T. L.; Lai, J. R.; LePlae, P. R.; Gellman, S. H. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3963-3966. (13) Clark, T. D.; Buehler, L. K.; Ghadiri, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 651-656. (14) Cheng, R. P.; Gellman, S. H.; DeGrado, W. F. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 3219-3232. (15) Seebach, D.; Beck, A. K.; Bierbaum, D. J. Chem. BiodiVers. 2004, 1, 1111-1239. (16) Qiu, J. X.; Petersson, E. J.; Matthews, E. E.; Schepartz, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11338-11339. (17) Privalov, P. L.; Tiktopulo, E. I.; Venyaminov, S.; Griko Yu, V.; Makhatadze, G. I.; Khechinashvili, N. N. J. Mol. Biol. 1989, 205, 737750. (18) Please see Supporting Information for details. (19) Beke, T.; Somlai, C.; Perczel, A. J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27, 20-38. (20) O’Shea, E. K.; Klemm, J. D.; Kim, P. S.; Alber, T. Science 1991, 254, 539-544. (21) Crick, F. H. C. Acta Crystallogr. 1953, 6, 689-697.
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
VOL. 129, NO. 6, 2007 1533